Portland Public Schools
District Annual Education Report
2005-2006
Overview of District
Accreditation Status
Education Yes!-The Michigan Department of Education grants accreditation to schools via the Education Yes! program. During the 2004-2005 school year, all four district buildings completed a rigorous self-assessment. With few exceptions, Portland Public Schools are “Systematically and Consistently Meeting Criteria”.
School Report Card
The Michigan Department of Education has established the School Report Card to provide an assessment of several measures of a school’s performance:
|
|
Oakwood
Elementary |
Westwood
Elementary |
Middle
School |
High
School |
||||
|
Component |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
|
Student Achievement Status |
88.8 (B) |
92.0 (A) |
88.8 (B) |
86.6 (B) |
77.8 (C) |
88.3 (B) |
71.1 (C) |
71.2 (C) |
|
Indicators of School Performance |
76.0 (C) |
83.0 (B) |
94.0 (A) |
95.0 (A) |
92.0 (A) |
95.0 (A) |
87.0 (B) |
95.0 (A) |
|
Preliminary Grade |
84.0 (B) |
89.0 (B) |
90.0 (A) |
89.0 (B) |
83.0 (B) |
90.0 (A) |
76.0 (C) |
79.0 (C) |
|
AYP Status |
Met AYP |
Met AYP |
Met AYP |
Met AYP |
Met AYP |
Met AYP |
Met AYP |
Met AYP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Grade |
B |
A |
A |
B |
B |
A |
C |
C |
Specialized
Schools
Special Education: Some district students are transported to
programs located in and operated by
Vocational Education: Over 70
Alternative Education: Portland Public Schools offers an alternative education program for those students who are not able to achieve academic success in the regular educational setting. This program operates under the auspices of Adult and Community Education.
Retention
Rate
The term retention refers to the
proportion of pupils who have not dropped out of school in the preceding
school year. The State of
School Improvement
Plan
Identifying needs, setting goals and developing and evaluating action plans is what school improvement is all about. The School Improvement Teams include parents, business and community leaders and school staff who work together to formulate goals and action plans. The teams analyze achievement data, survey data and data from other sources to formulate goals and action plans.
Each building in the district established a School Improvement Team to facilitate site-based decision making, establishing building-level goals to support the attainment of district-level goals. Copies of the building level Annual Report, which contains school improvement goals and plans, as well as student achievement data, are available by contacting the school office.
Student Assessment
Data
MEAP Data
The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) tests are administered each year to the district’ 4th, 5th, 7th, 8th, and 11th grade students. The results of the 2005 MEAP tests are as follows:
(Note: Figures represent the percentage of test students who score in the respective level of achievement. For elementary and middle school tests, Level 1 is “Exceeds Michigan Standards”; Level 2 is “Met Michigan Standards”; Level 3 is “At Basic Level”; and Level 4 is “Apprentice”. For high school tests, Level 1 is “Exceeds Michigan Standards; Level 2 is “Met Michigan Standards”; Level 3 is “At Basic Level”; and Level 4 is “Not Endorsed”.)
Grade 3
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 30 56 10 3
Grade 3 Writing
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 4 47 40 8
Grade 3 English/Language Arts
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 13 65 19 3
Grade 3 Math
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 48 39 12 1
Grade 4
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 22 61 15 2
Grade 4 Writing
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 3 52 40 5
Grade 4 English/Language Arts
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 8 68 22 3
Grade 4 Mathematics
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 36 45 14 4
Grade 5
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 24 56 13 7
Grade 5 Writing
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 3 60 34 3
Grade 5 English/Language Arts
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 10 65 21 4
Grade 5 Science
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 29 47 20 4
Grade 5 Math
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 32 42 21 5
Grade 6
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 23 57 11 6
Grade 6 Writing
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 7 22 68 3
Grade 6 English/Language Arts
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 12 65 19 5
Grade 6 Math
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 29 36 25 10
Grade 6 Social Studies
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 50 23 13 9
Grade 7
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 18 58 14 11
Grade 7 Writing
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 3 64 28 5
Grade 7 English/Language Arts
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 7 66 19 8
Grade 7 Math
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 27 33 30 11
Grade 8 Science
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 33 44 16 7
Grade 8 Math
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 31 33 23 14
Grade 8
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 19 54 16 12
Grade 8 Writing
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 8 57 28 8
Grade 8 English Language Arts
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 10 59 21 10
Grade 9 Social Studies
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 31 43 20 5
Grade 11 Math
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 9 37 16 38
Grade 11 Science
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 5 47 18 30
Grade 11
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 1 60 24 15
Grade 11 Writing
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 3 43 47 7
Grade 11 English/Language Arts
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 1 51 39 9
Grade 11 Social Studies
2006 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
State 38 41 12 8
ACT- Following is a 5-year history of average composite scores for ACT-tested graduates. A “perfect” ACT score is a 36.
|
|
’00-‘01 |
’01-‘02 |
’02-‘03 |
’03-‘04 |
’04-‘05 |
’05-‘06 |
|
PHS |
22.8 |
20.6 |
22.9 |
21.4 |
21.2 |
20.6 |
|
State |
21.4 |
21.1 |
22.5 |
22.5 |
19.8 |
21.1 |
Parent Involvement
Parent-Teacher Conferences- The parent/teacher conference attendance percentages for the 2005-2006 school year:
|
|
FALL |
SPRING |
|
Oakwood Elementary |
97% |
94% |
|
Westwood Elementary |
96% |
95% |
|
Middle School |
65% |
23% |
|
High School |
56% |
38% |
Core Curriculum
Process
for Development
Development of curriculum for Portland Public Schools is based upon the Michigan Curriculum Frameworks Standards and Benchmarks and Grade Level Content Expectations. Curriculum development takes place at the building level, followed by Board of Education approval.
Process
for Alignment
Individual teachers have aligned their course syllabi with the Michigan Curriculum Frameworks Benchmarks and Standards and Grade Level Content Expectations. Daily/weekly lesson plans are developed for instructions which are also aligned with Standards and Benchmarks and Grade Level Content Expectations.
Equitable
Access to Appropriate Instruction
Teacher teams are in the process of constructing “common assessments” for courses and subject matter areas to be administered to student in the district. Item analysis of these assessments will assist instructors in making pedagogical decisions.